top of page

◀ Home

This case study illustrates how I launched an MVP in two days to validate a hypothesis.

Company Type: Startup
Product: Mental health chatbot
Company size: < 10
Duration of engagement: 1 month
This case study demonstrates the following skills:
  1. I first understand the goals clearly. I also understand non-goals, which draws a boundary around the goals. In this case, the purpose of the MVP was to validate market demand for an idea, not to build a stable foundation that the startup can build on top of for years to come. What's appropriate for a series-B startup is not appropriate for an early-stage startup, and I'm able to adapt and do what's needed.
  2. I'm able to move fast, like launching an MVP in two days.
  3. I flag risks up front, like the WhatsApp API not yet being open for general use, before building rather than after.
  4. I generate multiple options, like a standalone chatbot and a Telegram bot.
  5. If the startup decides to build one option in-house, I'm able to give them initial guidance and then advise when they have problems. I can work in different engagement models depending on what the client prefers.
  6. I was able to help the startup conclude in a month that the entire idea of a mental health bot (whether a Telegram or standalone bot) has limited potential. The first goal of a startup is validated learning: learning that something doesn't work quickly and cheaply is a great outcome.
This flowchart tells you how I executed this project at a high level, followed by a detailed flowchart:

Website flowcharts.png
Website flowcharts (1).png
I was introduced to Kartick by a common friend from Sequoia. I would often ping Kartick about questions related to the tech stack and product capabilities. He has not only answered those questions for me but also taught me how to think and approach those questions effectively. He has a deep technical understanding and an eye for business nuances.”
bottom of page